Federal Court Blocks Texas Congressional Map

Texas Redistricting Overturned: What It Means for San Antonio A federal court has thrown out Texas’ recently redrawn congressional maps, a decision that could significantly reshape the political landscape for San Antonio and beyond. This ruling restores several Democratic seats and upends election plans for numerous candidates across the Lone Star State. Federal Court Blocks Texas’ Congressional Map In a significant preliminary injunction, a three-judge federal panel in El Paso reversed the mid-decade congressional map […]

Federal Court Blocks Texas Congressional Map

Texas Redistricting Overturned: What It Means for San Antonio

A federal court has thrown out Texas’ recently redrawn congressional maps, a decision that could significantly reshape the political landscape for San Antonio and beyond. This ruling restores several Democratic seats and upends election plans for numerous candidates across the Lone Star State.

Federal Court Blocks Texas’ Congressional Map

In a significant preliminary injunction, a three-judge federal panel in El Paso reversed the mid-decade congressional map that Texas Republicans pushed through this past summer. Trump-appointed Judge Jeffrey Brown, in a 2-to-1 decision, stated that “substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.” This ruling marks a victory for those who argued the redrawing aimed to disenfranchise communities of color.

Immediate Impact on San Antonio and Austin

If upheld, this court ruling will restore San Antonio’s four congressional seats, which had been significantly reduced under the redrawn map. The decision directly impacts U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, whose San Antonio-Austin district was replaced with a Republican stronghold, forcing him to plan a run for an Austin-only blue district.

Rep. Greg Casar’s District Restored

The original redistricting would have left San Antonio and Austin with only one reliably blue district each. With his district now potentially restored, Rep. Casar has tweeted his intent to run for reelection in his current district, representing both San Antonio and Austin. This reversal also calls into question the plans of Republican candidates like Carlos De la Cruz, John Lujan, City Council member Mark Whyte, and Commissioner Grant Moody, who were eyeing Casar’s newly redrawn District 35 and had already begun fundraising.

Lloyd Doggett Reverses Retirement

The gerrymandering scheme also prompted 79-year-old U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin Democrat, to announce his retirement, making way for Casar. Following the court’s decision, Doggett quickly reversed course, announcing in a video that he is now seeking reelection for TX-37. “For all those Republicans, who have tried for so many years in so many ways to assure my defeat by gerrymander, not yet, not so quick,” Doggett declared.

Wider Implications for Democrats and Republicans

The court’s decision also restores seats for other prominent Democrats, including Dallas U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett and Houston U.S. Rep. Al Green, both outspoken progressive voices. For Crockett, the restoration of her seat could influence her potential U.S. Senate bid against Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, a decision she plans to make by Thanksgiving.

From the Republican perspective, this ruling means the loss of a potential five-seat gain in the U.S. House, further complicating their efforts to guard a razor-thin majority. Democratic Congressman Joaquin Castro of San Antonio lauded the decision, stating, “The courts blocked Governor Abbott and Trump’s illegal power grab. Their racist re-districting attempt would undermine the voting power of Latino and Black communities. They failed. This is the right decision.”

The Road Ahead: Supreme Court Appeal

As anticipated, Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has already signaled his intent to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting a stay. Paxton maintains that “The Big Beautiful Map was entirely legal and passed for partisan purposes to better represent the political affiliations of Texas.” The U.S. Supreme Court faces a critical deadline of December 8th—Texas’ filing deadline for the midterm elections—to issue a ruling. Should they fail to act, the elections will proceed using the existing 2021 map.

Redistricting Impact Snapshot

Aspect Gerrymandered Map (Blocked) Restored Map (Pre-Gerrymander)
San Antonio Seats Reduced to one reliably blue Restored to four congressional seats
Rep. Greg Casar’s District Replaced with Republican stronghold District 35 (San Antonio/Austin) restored
Rep. Lloyd Doggett’s Plans Announced retirement Reversed retirement, seeking re-election
Overall GOP House Gains Potential 5-seat gain Lost potential gains

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What was the core reason for the court’s decision?
    The federal court determined that the 2025 redistricting map was unconstitutional due to racial gerrymandering.
  • Which San Antonio and Austin representatives are most affected?
    U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, whose district covering both San Antonio and Austin is restored, and U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who has reversed his retirement plans.
  • Will this ruling definitely stand?
    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, so the final outcome is still pending.
  • What is the critical upcoming deadline?
    The U.S. Supreme Court must rule by December 8th, which is Texas’ filing deadline for the midterm elections.

As the legal battle continues, San Antonians should stay informed about these developments, as the Supreme Court’s decision will have direct consequences for our representation in Congress and the broader political landscape of Texas.

Federal Court Blocks Texas Congressional Map

Scroll to Top